Scientific Information WORKING GROUP ORGANIZATION
CHAIRMAN :
Private group list :
[WSIS-SI WG ] si-wg googlegroups.com
( the mailing list siwsis-cs.org is no longer used )
to be open when the procedural stage of the WSIS e-Science has been completed :
Public discussion List :
ScientificInformationgooglegroups.com
( discussion list open to non-members )
STEERING COMMITTEE
ADVISORY BOARD
- Dr. Robert F. Curl,
1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
( rfcurlrice.edu )
- Dr. Richard R. Ernst,
1991 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
( ernstphys.chem.ethz.ch )
- Dr. Yuan-Tseh Lee,
1986 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
( ytleegate.sinica.edu.tw )
- Dr Yuri Bushuev, ISUCT
( bushuevisuct.ru )
- Dr. Rafael Capurro,
ICIE
( capurrohdm-stuttgart.de )
- Dr.Leslie Chan, University of Toronto at Scarborough,
Bioline,
( bioline.internationalutoronto.ca,
chanutsc.utoronto.ca )
- Dr. Stevan Harnad,
Open Archives Initiative>,
Eprints
( harnadecs.soton.ac.uk )
- Mr. Bruno Oudet,French Delegation
(Bruno.Oudetimag.fr)
- Dr.Jerome Reichmann
(reichmanlaw.duke.edu)
- Dr. Simone Rieger, Max-Planck-Institut f�r Wissenschaftsgeschichte
(riegermpiwg-berlin.mpg.de)
- Mr. Urs Schoepflin Max-Planck-Institut f�r Wissenschaftsgeschichte
(schoepflmpiwg-berlin.mpg.de)
- H.E Dr. Diana Simic deputy minister,
Ministry of Science and Technology, Croatia, ( diana.simicimi.hr )
The WG comprises two kind of boards :
- The Steering Committee includes NGOs' representatives.
- The Advisory Committee may include representative of
any WSIS participants : UN, IGOs, Governments, Business Entities
and NGOs as well as scientists that do no belong to organizations
accredited at the WSIS.
The task of the Steering Committee is to prepare
contributions to the draft
Declaration of Principles and Action Plan,
to organize round tables, meetings, actions in relationship to
WSIS SI issues.
The Advisory Committee provides help and advise to the Steering Committee,
and may include representatives of governments, foundations and companies,
that are willing to participate and provide assistance to events
organized by the WG, as well as scientists.
After some discussions, it has been found that our initial requirement that scientists
must belong to accredited organizations
was very detrimental to an open consultative process for several reasons :
- It is time-consuming and cumbersome for most scientists to ask
their institutions to be accredited.
- It is the institution that is represented, it the opinion of
the accredited organization which is stated. Unless, there is a good
working relationship between the concerned scientist and the
head of the institution, the position of the institution and the
concerned scientist may differ. This is alleviated by the fact,
that WG reunions are pretty informal at PrepCom meetings and
no records are made concerning the specific author of a recommendation that
is adopted by the WG.
- Some institutions,
lacking personnel with international diplomatic background,
are reluctant to join the WSIS process.
|
|