Report
Multi-Stakeholders Consultation Meeting on
"E-Science" (Action Line C7)
China Resources Hotel, Beijing, China
22 October 2006
Contents
1. Summary p3
2. Meeting Report p4
3. Meeting Agenda p15
4. Draft Terms of Reference for functioning of the Multi-stakeholders Team p16
5. Terms of Reference for Moderators/Facilitators of WSIS Action Lines p19
6. Working methods of the multi-stakeholder team on Action Line C7 “E-Science”: Preliminary proposal p21
7. WSIS - Plan of Action p24
Summary
The E-Science multistakholders consultation meeting was held in the China Resources Hotel, Beijing, P.R. of China on the 22 October 2006 (one day before the 20th International CODATA Conference which will be held in Beijing, 23-25 October 2006). The meeting was attended by 35 participants from non-governmental organizations and government representatives, who came from the following countries: Azerbaijan (Republic of), Brazil, Canada, China, Cuba, Georgia, India, Japan, Jordan, Nigeria, Oman, Palestine territory, Sri Lanka, USA, Zambia.
UNESCO organized the E-science multi stakeholder consultation meeting in its capacity as the provisional focal point. It was hosted by the Government of China and organized in conjunction with CODATA and the Chinese Academy of Science. UNCTAD representative, Prof. Hafiz Mirza, also attended the meeting.
The meeting was started by a short Opening ceremony to set the stage. Mr. Mustafa El Tayeb, Director of Division for Science Policy and Sustainable Development, opened the meeting. After its opening remarks, Mr. El Tayeb invited four resource persons, Prof. Shuichi Iwata, President of CODATA and Dr Paul F. Uhlir, Director of International S&T Information Programs, Dr Francis Muguet, chair of the WSIS Civil Society Working Group on Scientific Information (WSIS-SI) and Dr. Baoping YAN, Director of Expert Committee for Informatization of Chinese Academy of Science, to give their presentations which were followed by a discussion. In the following session, all participants were invited to express their opinion and their expectation on E-Science.
The meeting participants designated UNESCO as facilitator, and UNCTAD as co-facilitator, of the C7 E-Science action line. The meeting participants constituted themselves as an initial core group of the E-Science Action Line. Membership of the core team could be extended to government and international organization representatives, scientists, librarians, and other concerned stakeholders. The participants have also agreed about the next actions to be taken by the multi-stakeholder team.
Meeting Report
1. Opening session
The meeting was started by a short Opening session to set the stage. Mr. Mustafa El Tayeb, Director of Division for Science Policy and Sustainable Development, opened the meeting. Mr. el Tayeb refreshed memory of participants about the E-Science. The E-science is part of the WSIS Action Line C7, entitled ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life. ICT applications can support sustainable development, in the fields of public administration, business, education and training, health, employment, environment, agriculture and science within the framework of national e-strategies. Accordingly the Action line C7 para. 22 defines 5 areas of action that are essential to promote development and sharing of scientific knowledge development within the context of ICT.
Given, however, the breadth of the topics covered under E-science and considering the varied expertise and priorities among stakeholders, it is suggested that we identify/establish sub-groups working on specific areas/topics of the Action Line.
The multistakeholders consultation meeting aims to:
facilitate the initial contacts and sharing of information among multistakeholders on their priorities and expertise in the implementation of each area of action;
consolidate a multistakeholders team for E-science;
designate facilitator(s)/moderator(s) for the multistakeholder team1
agree on the working methods of the multistakeholder team, including their activities and expected outcomes.
At the end of his remarks Mr. El Tayeb invited participants to agree about the meeting agenda. The provisional meeting agenda was approved by participants.
2. Invited Speakers
a. Genesis of E-Science and next step for its implementation
by Shuichi Iwata, President of CODATA
Prof. Iwata Brief History-Dawn started his presentation by explaining a brief historical background on the interest of the CODATA in E-Science. The CODATA starting point is the ICSU/CODATA UNESCO Symposium March 2003 held at UNESCO Headquarters in Paris, where we have set the following agenda on science data:
- Describe the role, value, and limits that the public domain and open access to digital data and information have in the context of international research.
- Identify and analyze the various legal, economic, and technological pressures on the public domain in digital data and information, and their potential effects on international research.
Review the existing and proposed approaches for preserving and promoting the public domain and open access to S&T data and information on a global basis, with particular attention to the needs of developing countries.
Identify and analyze important issues for follow up by the ICSU family of organizations and for the development of an Action Plan in this area by ICSU and UNESCO in preparation for the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).
After this Symposium, several activities have been conducted in linking with information society, such as: WSIS Summit in Geneva December 2003, CODATA 2004, CODATA UNESCO Symposium September 2005, WSIS Tunis, and CODATA 2006 in Beijing. It is good time to think about the status of digital sharing data and information.
To step forward, we need many methodologies such semantic, ontology and transfer model. We also need to pay attention on field of educational system (capacity building) how to deal with data, as well as how to improve science productivity around the world. There is small science, which are not used effectively, and how to with long tails of individual care-exemplars’ and paradigms.
He stated that we have been emerging with mistakes and successes. We need to make our experiences into public goods. It starts from our collaboration fighting against public bad!
The digital system is divided between the haves and not- haves. The is a need to a universal access with equal opportunities for all to scientific knowledge and the creation and dissemination of scientific and technical information-fair competition.
He described the condition of the data activities in general:
The databases are everywhere, but not well organized and too many duplications, less interoperability, and piecewise.
- How to integrate the databases for ad hoc application
- We need to design positive incentives to go beyond “collection”
- There are many that have not been used by a majority of people but it could be useful for others.
Our big challenge is how to develop a service channel adapted to the contents, contexts and users. The first solution is that we need to change our mind set by using E-Science. Data Science may contribute as one of discipline of E-Science.
At the end of his presentation, Prof Iwata invited meeting participant to work together to establish E-Science under leadership of UNESCO.
b. CODATA Global Information Commons for Science Initiative
by
Paul F. Uhlir, Director, Office of International Scientific and
Technical Information Programs, The National Academies, Washington,
DC, USA
Dr. Uhlir introduced his presentation by explaining the historical background behind the global information for science. There is a tremendous difference between old print paradigm and global digital network paradigm, from point of view qualitative and quantitative.
He defined the information commons as a digital information originating principally from government or publicly-funded sources, made freely available for common use online, either in the public domain or with only some limited rights reserved, typically organized thematically through an institutional mechanism.
Existing information commons (open access) models:
- Open data centers and archives (e.g., GenBank, space science data centers);
- Federated open data networks (e.g., World Data Centers, Global Biodiversity Information - Facility, South African Environmental Observation Network);
- Virtual observatories (e.g., the International Virtual Observatory for astronomy, Digital Earth);
- Open access journals (e.g., PLOS + > 2500 scholarly journals, many in developing world—SciELO, Bioline International);
- Open institutional repositories for an institution’s scholarly works (e.g., the Indian Institute for Science, + > 100s/Ks? globally)
- Open institutional repositories for publications in a specific subject area (e.g., the physics arXiv, Qi Ji, PubMedCentral);
- Free university curricula online (e.g., the MIT Open CourseWare);
- Discipline-based commons (e.g., conservation commons).
Advantages of information commons for science:
Facilitates transfer of information North -> South and South <-> South;
Promotes capacity building in developing countries;
Promotes interdisciplinary, inter-sectoral, inter-institutional, and international research and cooperation;
Avoids duplication of research and promotes new research and new types of research;
Reinforces open scientific inquiry and encourages diversity of analysis and opinion,
Allows for the verification of previous results,
Makes possible the testing of new or alternative hypotheses and methods of analysis;
Facilitates the education of new researchers;
Enables the exploration of topics not envisioned by the initial investigators;
Facilitates automated digital knowledge discovery and diffusion;
Generally helps to increase the research potential of digital technologies and information, thereby providing greater returns from the public investment in research;
Many other economic, social, and political advantages (not covered here)
Key obstacles to creating information commons:
Development of adequate incentives at the individual, community, institutional, and governmental levels;
Long-term financial sustainability of different information commons models;
Legitimate legal restrictions (protection of national security, privacy, confidentiality, and IPRs);
Effective technical and organizational implementation.
Failure to overcome these obstacles leads to compromises in achieving the ideal commons approach and may frequently result in the creation of “semi-commons”.
The objectives of CODATA’s GICSI are to:
(1) Improve understanding and increase awareness of the societal and economic benefits of easy access to and use of scientific data and information, particularly those resulting from governmental or publicly funded research activities;
(2) Identify and promote the broad adoption of successful institutional and legal models for providing open availability on a sustainable basis and facilitating reuse of data and information;
(3) Encourage and help coordinate the efforts of the many stakeholders in the world’s diverse research community who are engaged in devising and implementing effective approaches to attaining these objectives, with particular attention to the circumstances of the developing as well as developed countries.
(4) Promote all of the objectives of the Initiative through the development of an online “open access knowledge environment”.
Key milestones:
GICSI concept developed at the U.S. NAS and CODATA 2002-2005
Initiative formed at CODATA Workshop at UNESCO, in September 2005
Initiative formally announced at WSIS in Tunis in November 2005
GICSI workshops held in Dublin, Brussels, and Beijing in 2006
Funding currently being solicited to establish Secretariat and regional offices to implement the GICSI objectives
At the end of his presentation, Dr Uhlir invited participants to support CODATA effort on the development of the CODATA Global Information Commons for Science Initiative.
c. E-Science" (Action Line C7)
by Dr. Francis , Muguet, chair of WSIS Civil Society Working Group on Scientific Information ( WSIS-SI http://wsis-si.org)
Dr. Francis Muguet started his presentation by refreshing the memory of participants about the formulation of WSIS action lines (recommendation). The process of the WSIS was initiated by Tunisia. The idea was to bridge the digital divide within the context of sustainable. The recommendations were made through an intergovernmental process. The States were those who voted the recommendations. In this summit, was used multi stakeholders approach involving civil society and private sector. This approach was new and innovative.
He explained as well the legal value of recommendations. There are several. The first one, is that a State may implement the recommendations of the summit without another State being able to criticize it, because the latter has also undersigned the WSIS recommendations. For example, if government decides to enforce an open access policy, no other country may oppose it before the WTO (World Trade Organization) on the ground that this policy may jeopardize the interests of commercial publishers.
Another value which is also important, relates to the situation of an institution, in a certain country, that wishes to implement an open access policy. It will be difficult for the government of that country to criticize this open access policy. since this government has already undersigned recommendations in favor of Open Access policies at the WSIS. Therefore, the importance of the WSIS recommendations cannot be underestimated, even if governments are not bound to enforce them.
Dr. Muguet discussed Open Access within general context, above the purely scientific context. Whenever Open access is pictured as only an idealistic view, it is criticized by the commercial publishing sector, as “anti-business”, therefore it is necessary to dispel this misrepresentation, and to study the issue from a global perspective. Concerning research financed by public funding (State or Government), the rational of financing research is to stimulate economic growth. If we are making a macro economic analysis, even within an ultra liberal view, Open Access does make sense as not being “anti-business” but on the contrary, as an active pro business policy fostering job creation, since it is making available information crucial to economic development, and in particular sustainable development. The current situation tragically decreases the Keynesian multiplier factor of public funding of scientific research. Open Access vastly increases this factor. Open Access has also a positive impact on Education and Learning across all sectors of society, all over the world. From an ethical point of view, the question must be debated whether it is ethical to resell donated health information.
This meeting is one of the series of meeting organizing by UNESCO to follow up the WSIS action lines, others action lines were discussed recently in Paris. In the Paris meeting was accepted the principle that the topics of action lines are divided into two: the main item topics and cross-cutting ones.
At the end of his presentation, Dr Muguet proposed to follow the topics as itemized in the WSIS texts for E-Science:
The main item topics:
( Plan of action 22a ) academic network access, also related to action line C2 9c) and C4
( Plan of action 22b ) open access, related to with action line C3 10 i) and Geneva declaration of Principles para 28 ),
( Plan of action 22c ) scientific knowledge sharing with P2P
( Plan of action 22d ) preservation of scientific data and scientific database
( Plan of action 22e ) Metadata, semantic web and standardized ontologies for scientific information
For the cross cutting topics:
Research ( Geneva declaration of Principles )
Ethics in science ( related to action line C10 )
Digital divide linked with financial mechanisms ( Tunis agenda )
Multi stakeholder partnerships ( Tunis agenda )
Biomedical research and health ( strongly related with C7 e-health)
Dr Muguet has also emphasized that the working methods of the C7 e-science action line should take some inspiration from those adopted in Paris for the C3 access to knowledge action line.
Cross-cutting subgroups are required for better coordination and to avoid duplication of efforts. Some cross-cutting subgroups do also correspond to items of the Tunis agenda, such as financial mechanisms and multi stakeholder partnerships whose follow-up has not been organized yet with a clear assignment to specific UN agencies.
The principle, that only intergovernmental organizations could be retained as e-science action line facilitator or co-facilitators, seems reasonable, considering the high costs of coordination within the scientific sector, at the condition that moderators at the “paragraph” or topic or subgroup level could be chosen in an inclusive way and that financial assistance could be provided to help civil society groupings such as the WSIS Civil Society Working Group on Scientific Information that has played a crucial role in the WSIS process so far, to carry on subgroup moderating or co-moderating activities.
Concerning Action line co-facilitators, scientific IGOs such as CERN, or regional IGOs such as OECD or cultural IGOs, such as Francophonie, could be of assistance in their respective capacities and mandates.
It is essential that some governments from both developed and developing countries be included as subgroups moderators or co-moderators. The involvement of governments, that are concerned with the crucial linkage between Open Access and Sustainable Development, is essential to the overall success of the implementation of this action line.
d. China Academy of Sciences’ (CAS) E-Science Activities
by Dr. YAN, Baoping, Director, Expert Committee for Informatization of CAS, Chief Engineer, Computer Network Information Center of CAS
After giving general introduction about CAS, Dr Yan explained the raisons why the CAS is interested in promoting E-Science. She said the following challenges in research push CAS to develop E-Science:
Science problems are more complex than ever
Science research object is not isolated, but cross-discipline and large-scale
Science data processing, simulation and computing become indispensable methods
Scientific researchers need more and more communication, collaboration, and coordination among them closer than ever…
Features of e-Science
- Opening: Joint together to cross-discipline, research organization and country; complex problem solving under open environment
- Sharing: Supercomputer, Data, Instruments, Human, results for research,
- Coordinating: Researching with colleagues or partners, distributed any places, institutes or across oceans as if they were within a same lab, via a kind of virtual research Lab.
Some Elements of e-Science
- E-Science Environment: Cyber-infrastructure and Scientific Research Facility based on IT
- New Scientific Research model under e-Science: e-science workflow
- New Organization Model for Researching under e-Science: v-Lab
- New tech & software: system/middleware/application, grid, web service, CA, security….
- New Scientist: e-Scientist – IT- enable researchers
- Pilot e-Science Applications
The E-Science Environment consist of:
- Computing resources: compute, storage,
- Scientific Data resources: test data, observe and survey, collect…
- Communication resources: network…
- Digital Library
- Digital specimen Library
- Scientific Instruments and wild field observing stations based IT and Internet (networking “last mile»)
-- accelerators, telescopes, sensors…
-- eco-system station, Atmosphere station, disaster station…..
CAS started his action in E-Science by Informatization Program of CAS in 2001-2005, with total budget of 43.75 Millions US Dollar. The goals of this program are (i) Upgrading the cyber-infrastructure, i.e. , CSTNet , super computing, mass storage, SDB; (ii) Integrating content: CAS’ Web, Virtual Science Museum; (iii) Driving some science researches based IP; (iv) Developing new IT technologies, including grid, NGI. and (v) Training IT-enable scientists and researchers.
Several scientific investigating Actions in wild field have also been conducting such as: Predication of earthquake in Yangjiang, Guangdong, LURR special scan of the Chinese Mainland and the location of Yangjiang earthquake; long-term climate simulation, weather effect on ecosystem and city planning of Beijing.
Following activities have also been conducting/
1. Scientific Database (SDB) developments, which involving 45 institutions across 16 cities to create 503 databases (16.6TB+ total volume), covering many disciplines such as: chemistry, biology, geosciences, environment, astronomy, high-energy physics, …
2. Standardization Activities
Standardized scientific database development process
Published a standard specification for documents of database development
Documents of database lifecycle are required
Promoting scientific database publish and “full and free” sharing
Published an ordinance of data publish and share
Most members published “data sharing statement”
3. Scientific Data Grid (SDG) is composed of two parts, core services and application-oriented services, especially in architecture.
At the last part of her presentation Dr Yan presented the CAS’ e-Science Planning in Future, 2006-2010, within the CAS 11th Five-year Informatization Program:
Continue to develop the infrastructure and existing applications: SDB, NSDL, HPC(.100Tflops), CSTNet(2.5-10Gbps), ARP-2, …
e-Science Facility: Networks of field stations/instruments, Mobile equip., Digital library of natural resources
E-Science Applications: HEP, Astro, Bio, Geo, Chemistry, …
Resource Integration Platform: Glue between infrastructure and e-Science facility
Supporting Environment for Applications: Glue between facility and applications
The E-Science in CAS is developing on the five following element: (i) Cyber- infrastructure, Lambda network, HPC, mass storage, SD; (ii) Cyber-resource integration; (iii) Experimental Facility based IP; (iv) E-Science Virtual Lab; and 5v) E-Science Applications
At the end of her presentation Dr Yan summarized her presentation as follows:
Future scientific researches and scientific applications need much more new and useful environment, tools and models
E-Science or science researches through cyber- infrastructure will be one of the main goals of CAS in the next five years
E-Science need more international collaborations on cyber infrastructure and e-Science applications
Merging scientific domain and IT, not only in IT technology and scientific knowledge, but also in human, e.g. e-scientist
3. Round Table Discussion
After an introduction by the UNCTAD representative Prof. Hafiz Mirza, representatives or participants from the following countries expressed their opinion and expectation on E-Science: Georgia, Azerbaijan, Jordan, Brazil, Nigeria, West Bank (Palestine territory), Germany, and Zambia.
In general participants have a lot of expectation about E-Science to resolve the problems of access to scientific data and information, both in developed and in developing countries.
4. Appointment of the Facilitator:
At the suggestion of the representative from Nigeria, the participants unanimously elected UNESCO as lead facilitator for Action line C-7, E-Science with UNCTAD as a co-facilitator.
It appears that specifically in the scientific field, only Intergovernmental Organizations have the status and sufficient resources to cover the costs of their own activities, and to contribute to overall WSIS implementation.
5. Working Arrangement
We
should develop a core group who will determine the programme
activities in E-Science and would act as a inclusive convenor. The
core group is currently composed with the participants of the
Beijing multi stakeholders meeting. The Core group should
work on specific topics. Dr. Uhlir proposed to bring people who are
working in E-Science in the core team, instead of starting a new
topic without any specialist in the field.
Dr El Tayeb, director of UNESCO Division for Science Policy and Sustainable Development, reiterated the need to avoid delays and the intent of UNESCO to closely follow the items in the WSIS texts that were determined after several years of intense intergovernmental negotiations, and to fully play its role of facilitator, with an emphasis towards development, underlined by the presence of UNCTAD as a co-facilitator.
The draft terms of reference of the Action line multi-stakeholder team, of the reference of the facilitator, and the Working methods have been refined to reflect those orientations, recent decisions of ECOSOC and CSTD.
Dr. El Tayeb thanked Prof. Hafiz Mirza, and UNCTAD for having made possible the participation of several scientists from developing countries.
Conclusion : UNESCO and UNCTAD are going to mobilize the core-group while trying to convene more people, with the help of all WSIS stakeholders, in a more efficient and inclusive way than for the first action-line meeting.
Consultation on facilitation of
WSIS
Action Line:
"E-Science" (C7)
22 October 2006, 09.30 a.m. - 4.30 p.m., China Resources Hotel, Beijing, China
Meeting Agenda
|
Opening Remark by UNESCO Representative, By Mustafa El Tayeb, Director Science Policy and Sustainable Development Division |
|
Adoption of the agenda |
|
Reports |
|
a) Genesis of E-Science and next step for its implementation, by Prof. Shuichi IWATA, President, CODATA |
|
|
|
Initial sharing by stakeholders of their respective actions and priorities in the implementation of the E Science (C7) - Intervention and presentation of participants: - Presentation by Prof. Yan Bao Ping, Director, Information Expert Committee Group, Chinese Academy of Sciences. |
|
Modalities of the implementation of the E Science (Action Line C7) |
|
a) Terms of reference of the Action line multi-stakeholder team |
|
b) Terms of reference of the facilitator/moderator |
|
c) Designation of a facilitator/moderator of the multi-stakeholder team |
|
d) Activities of multi-stakeholder team and the expected outcomes |
|
e) Working methods of the multi-stakeholder team on E-Science |
|
The present Terms of Reference are intended to serve as a guideline for the organizing the work of the stakeholders of Action Line C7 E-Science
A. Role of Multi-stakeholder Team
1. The Multi-stakeholder Team for Action Line C7 E-Science (referred to as “Team”) is comprised of all interested parties including governments, private sector, civil society and international organizations; the number of its members will be open-ended.
2. The overall goal of the Team is to facilitate the implementation of WSIS Action Line C7 E-Science, mainly through networking stakeholders, enhancing information exchange, knowledge creation, promoting and sharing good practices, investigating and promoting suitable legal frameworks, examining opportunities for collaboration and establishing partnerships among interested parties.
3. The Team will define its working methods, work plan and time table, as well as expected outcomes of its activities taking account of the terms of reference for moderators/facilitators of WSIS Action Lines, prepared on the occasion of the consultation meeting of action line moderators/facilitators (Geneva, 24 February 2006) (see Annex) that has been further refined.
4. The Team will identify actors in an open and inclusive process that ensures a mechanism for the full and active participation of governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing and developed countries, ( cf wording in Plan of Action, para 13 b) in addition to WSIS stakeholders, for the implementation of Action Line C7 E-Science, including IGOs, NGOs, civil society groups, academia and private sector and will “map” their activities in order to understand who the actors are and the scope of their interest in Action Line C7 E-Science.
5. Considering the breadth of the topics covered under Action Line C7 E-Science and the varied expertise and priorities among the stakeholders, the Team is to establish sub-groups working on the specific areas/topics itemized in Action Line C7 E-Science as well as other topics, notably cross-cutting topics, that could be identified, now and in the future, as appropriate by the team.
6. The Team will designate a facilitator for Action Line C7 E-Science (referred to as “Facilitator”), whose task will be defined in the subsequent paragraphs. The Facilitator could be a representative from government, intergovernmental organization, private sector and civil society. The Facilitator should be able to provide sufficient resources to cover the costs of its own activities, and/or to contribute to overall coordination of Action Line C7 E-Science. The Facilitator may constitute a cost-efficient multistakeholder advisory board to assist the Facilitator in its tasks.
The Team is also to designate a lead moderator, and possibly several co-moderators for each sub-group (referred to as “Sub-group Moderator”)3 .
B. Role of Facilitator and Sub-group Moderators
8. The main task of the Facilitator will be to coordinate the work of the Team as defined in paragraphs above so as to facilitate the networking, information exchange, sharing of experiences and good practices and identification of synergies among stakeholders, inter alia, by providing free and interoperable on-line networking tools, while ensuring an optimal choice of appropriate software that will best contribute to achieving development goals within local conditions ( Geneva Plan of Action para 10 j), suggesting processes and templates and/or organizing physical meeting, as appropriate. The Facilitator will work in cooperation with any Sub-group Moderators, who will carry out similar functions in respect of their sub-group.
9. The Facilitator will compile a report4 on the activities of the Team on the basis of the inputs from the Team Members, with a view to enable the ECOSOC to carry its responsibilities for overseeing the system-wide follow-up to WSIS outcomes, and specifically the Commission on Science and Technology for Development that effectively assist ECOSOC as the focal point in the system-wide follow-up, in particular the review and assessment of progress made in implementing the outcomes of WSIS (ECOSOC resolution on the CSTD, 27 July 2006), as well as UN agencies and programs active in the overall implementation process (such as ITU, UNESCO and UNDP), to have a complete picture of implementation across all action lines. The Facilitator will follow the instruction from the CSTD as regards to the frequency and period of submission of such report.
10. The Facilitator will participate, where necessary, in the coordination meeting of all facilitators of Action Lines and contribute to the overall reporting to all stakeholders on WSIS implementation.
11. The main task of any Sub-group Moderator will be to assist the work of the Facilitator by ensuring the networking of, as well as information exchange and sharing of good practices among the stakeholders of a specific sub-group. The Sub-group Moderators will also assist the Facilitator in reporting on the activities of the Team.
C. Role of Team Members
12. Each Team Member will: carry out concrete activities to further the objectives and implementation of Action Line C7 E-Science within the framework of its own mandate, programmes and resources; provide to the Team information on its respective initiatives including events, projects and studies; share its experience, knowledge and good practices with other Team Members through the modalities to be defined.
13. Each Team Member will provide inputs to the Facilitator and/or Sub-group Moderators on its activities related to the follow-up of Action Line C7 E-Science. with a view to facilitate reporting.
|
|
|
|
Terms of Reference for Facilitators & Moderators of WSIS Action Lines5
Context
Paras 108-109 of the Tunis Agenda for the Information Society set out a plan for multi-stakeholder implementation at the international level of the WSIS Plan of Action. The Annex to the document proposes a list of moderators/facilitators for stakeholder teams for each Action Line.
Responsibilities of Action Line Facilitators and Subgroup Moderators/
The primary goal of each multi-stakeholder team is implementation of the WSIS Plan of Action at the international level. A secondary objective is information-sharing and promotion of WSIS goals.
For each action line, action line facilitators and subgroup moderators should take the lead in facilitating the work of multi-stakeholder teams of interested parties (including governments, private sector, civil society, and international organisations).
For each action line, there may be several facilitators and subgroup moderators, including representatives from governments, private sector and civil society as well as appropriate UN agencies or Regional Commissions. However, one or two of the facilitators and moderators should be nominated as exercising the lead role for the purposes of coordination.
UN agencies or Regional Commissions and other stakeholders may be involved in more than one action line, both as moderators/facilitators and as participants.
The coordination of the implementation of each action line should help to avoid duplication of activities by, inter alia, information exchange, creation of knowledge, sharing of best practices and assistance in developing multi-stakeholder including public/private partnership (Tunis Agenda, para 110).
The modalities of coordination for each action line are to be worked out among the facilitators and moderators, as well as among the participants in the multi-stakeholder team. They may involve, for instance, a combination of face-to-face meetings, teleconferences, online forums, joint projects or programmes, websites, databases, newsletters etc.
Each multi-stakeholder team should seek to establish two-ways interactive dialogues with national implementation mechanisms (para 100) and with regional implementation activities (para 101)
Each multi-stakeholder team should develop reports on an [annual] basis for submission [before the end of November each year] to enable the suggested lead agencies—ITU, UNESCO and UNDP—to report on a complete picture across the action lines. These reports may also take the form of updates or additions to the WSIS stocktaking database, to be maintained and updated by ITU and UNCTAD.
Candidates to serve as Action Line Facilitators should be able to provide sufficient resources to cover the costs of their own activities, and/or to contribute to overall WSIS implementation.
Action Line Facilitators and subgroup Moderators should be prepared to participate in coordination meetings among all facilitators and moderators, to be held [once or twice per year] and to contribute to the development of overall reports on WSIS implementation.
In the event of queries, action line facilitators should refer to the Commission on Science and Technology for Development that effectively assist ECOSOC as the focal point in the system-wide follow-up, in particular the review and assessment of progress made in implementing the outcomes of WSIS (ECOSOC resolution on the CSTD, 27 July 2006),
Working methods of the multi-stakeholder team on
Action Line C7 “E-Science”
A. Introduction
Action Line C7, paragraph 22, recognizes the importance of science as key factors for the development of an Information Society that will contribute to economic and social development. Accordingly the Action line C7, paragraph 22, defines 5 areas of action (a) to (e) that are essential to promote scientific knowledge dissemination within the context of ICT.
Given, however, the breadth of the topics covered under Action Line C7, E-Science, and considering the varied expertise and priorities among stakeholders, it is suggested that we identify/establish sub-groups working on specific areas/topics of the Action Line.
B. Definition of sub-working groups
The definition is made by following closely the items of the WSIS texts :
( subgroup a ) academic network access, also related to action line C2 9c) and C4
( subgroup b ) open access, related to with action line C3 10 i) and Geneva declaration of Principles para 28 ),
( subgroup c ) scientific knowledge sharing with P2P
( subgroup d ) preservation of scientific data and scientific database
( subgroup e ) Metadata, semantic web and standardized ontologies for scientific information
For the cross cutting topics: an open-ended list is proposed that could be completed and regrouped anytime by the multistakolder team is proposed :
- Research ( Geneva declaration of Principles )
- Ethics in science ( related to action line C10 )
- Digital divide linked with financial mechanisms ( Tunis agenda )
- Multi stakeholder partnerships ( Tunis agenda )
- Biomedical science ( strongly related with C7 e-health)
C. Possible activities of the E-Science Multi-stakeholder team and of each subgroups
Formulating public policy in achieving the objectives
Identify concrete activities and/or group of activities for common implementation;
Implement concrete activities which respond to the respective objectives of the Working Group;
Exchange knowledge, experiences and best practices in the respective topic, using free and interoperable online tools, and promote them at national and regional level;
Make an assessment of legal frameworks with a view to overcoming any obstacles. and specifically to overcome the digital divide and barriers to access.
Strengthen international cooperation in the respective topic and pilot initiatives jointly designed, co-funded and implemented;
Monitor and report new findings, developments and initiatives in the respective topics.
Explore, in collaboration with other partners, the possibility of undertaking a global review of experiences in open access regimes, especially with regard to free and open source software and open academic and scientific journals ( CSTD resolution May 16, 2006, Geneva )
Modalities for interactive coordination and reporting
Document WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/5-E |
||
12 December 2003 |
||
Original: English |
||
Plan of Action |
A. |
Introduction |
|
|
|
1. |
The common vision and guiding principles of the Declaration are translated in this Plan of Action into concrete action lines to advance the achievement of the internationally-agreed development goals, including those in the Millennium Declaration, the Monterrey Consensus and the Johannesburg Declaration and Plan of Implementation, by promoting the use of ICT-based products, networks, services and applications, and to help countries overcome the digital divide. The Information Society envisaged in the Declaration of Principles will be realized in cooperation and solidarity by governments and all other stakeholders. |
|
|
2. |
The Information Society is an evolving concept that has reached different levels across the world, reflecting the different stages of development. Technological and other change is rapidly transforming the environment in which the Information Society is developed. The Plan of Action is thus an evolving platform to promote the Information Society at the national, regional and international levels. The unique two-phase structure of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) provides an opportunity to take this evolution into account. |
|
|
3. |
All stakeholders have an important role to play in the Information Society, especially through partnerships:
|
|
B. |
Objectives, goals and targets |
|
|
|
4. |
The objectives of the Plan of Action are to build an inclusive Information Society; to put the potential of knowledge and ICTs at the service of development; to promote the use of information and knowledge for the achievement of internationally agreed development goals, including those contained in the Millennium Declaration; and to address new challenges of the Information Society, at the national, regional and international levels. Opportunity shall be taken in phase two of the WSIS to evaluate and assess progress made towards bridging the digital divide. |
|
|
5. |
Specific targets for the Information Society will be established as appropriate, at the national level in the framework of national e-strategies and in accordance with national development policies, taking into account the different national circumstances. Such targets can serve as useful benchmarks for actions and for the evaluation of the progress made towards the attainment of the overall objectives of the Information Society. |
|
|
6. |
Based on internationally agreed development goals, including those in the Millennium Declaration, which are premised on international cooperation, indicative targets may serve as global references for improving connectivity and access in the use of ICTs in promoting the objectives of the Plan of Action, to be achieved by 2015. These targets may be taken into account in the establishment of the national targets, considering the different national circumstances:
|
|
|
7. |
In giving effect to these objectives, goals and targets, special attention will be paid to the needs of developing countries, and in particular to countries, peoples and groups cited in paragraphs 11-16 of the Declaration of Principles.
|
|
C. |
Action Lines |
|
|
The role of governments and all stakeholders in the promotion of ICTs for development |
|||
|
8. |
The effective participation of governments and all stakeholders is vital in developing the Information Society requiring cooperation and partnerships among all of them.
|
|
Information and communication infrastructure: an essential foundation for the Information Society |
|||
|
9. |
Infrastructure is central in achieving the goal of digital inclusion, enabling universal, sustainable, ubiquitous and affordable access to ICTs by all, taking into account relevant solutions already in place in developing countries and countries with economies in transition, to provide sustainable connectivity and access to remote and marginalized areas at national and regional levels.
|
|
Access to information and knowledge |
|||
|
10. |
ICTs allow people, anywhere in the world, to access information and knowledge almost instantaneously. Individuals, organizations and communities should benefit from access to knowledge and information.
|
|
Capacity building |
|||
|
11. |
Everyone should have the necessary skills to benefit fully from the Information Society. Therefore capacity building and ICT literacy are essential. ICTs can contribute to achieving universal education worldwide, through delivery of education and training of teachers, and offering improved conditions for lifelong learning, encompassing people that are outside the formal education process, and improving professional skills.
|
|
Building confidence and security in the use of ICTs |
|||
|
12. |
Confidence and security are among the main pillars of the Information Society.
|
|
Enabling environment |
|||
|
13. |
Confidence and security are among the main pillars of the Information Society.
|
|
ICT applications: benefits in all aspects of life |
|||
|
14. |
ICT applications can support sustainable development, in the fields of public administration, business, education and training, health, employment, environment, agriculture and science within the framework of national e-strategies. This would include actions within the following sectors: |
|
15. |
E-government
|
|
|
16. |
E-business
|
|
|
17. |
E-learning (see section C4)
|
|
|
18. |
E-health
|
|
|
19. |
E-employment
|
|
|
20. |
E-environment
|
|
|
21. |
E-agriculture
|
|
|
22. |
E-science
|
|
|
Cultural diversity and identity, linguistic diversity and local content |
|||
|
23. |
Cultural and linguistic diversity, while stimulating respect for cultural identity, traditions and religions, is essential to the development of an Information Society based on the dialogue among cultures and regional and international cooperation. It is an important factor for sustainable development.
|
|
Media |
|||
|
24. |
Cultural and linguistic diversity, while stimulating respect for cultural identity, traditions and religions, is essential to the development of an Information Society based on the dialogue among cultures and regional and international cooperation. It is an important factor for sustainable development.
|
|
Ethical dimensions of the Information Society |
|||
|
25. |
The Information Society should be subject to universally held values and promote the common good and to prevent abusive uses of ICTs.
|
|
International and regional cooperation |
|||
|
26. |
International cooperation among all stakeholders is vital in implementation of this plan of action and needs to be strengthened with a view to promoting universal access and bridging the digital divide, inter alia, by provision of means of implementation
|
|
D. |
Digital Solidarity Agenda |
|
|
|
27. |
The Digital Solidarity Agenda aims at putting in place the conditions for mobilizing human, financial and technological resources for inclusion of all men and women in the emerging Information Society. Close national, regional and international cooperation among all stakeholders in the implementation of this Agenda is vital. To overcome the digital divide, we need to use more efficiently existing approaches and mechanisms and fully explore new ones, in order to provide financing for the development of infrastructure, equipment, capacity building and content, which are essential for participation in the Information Society.
|
|
D1. |
Priorities and strategies |
||
|
|
|
|
D2. |
Mobilizing resources |
||
|
|
|
|
E. |
Follow-up and evaluation |
|
|
|
28. |
A realistic international performance evaluation and benchmarking (both qualitative and quantitative), through comparable statistical indicators and research results, should be developed to follow up the implementation of the objectives, goals and targets in the Plan of Action, taking into account different national circumstances.
|
|
F. |
Towards WSIS phase 2 (Tunis) |
|
|
|
29. |
Recalling General Assembly Resolution 56/183 and taking into account the outcome of the Geneva phase of the WSIS, a preparatory meeting will be held in the first half of 2004 to review those issues of the Information Society which should form the focus of the Tunis phase of the WSIS and to agree on the structure of the preparatory process for the second phase. In line with the decision of this Summit concerning its Tunis phase, the second phase of the WSIS should consider, inter alia:
|
|
******************************** |
|
1 UNESCO is only a “provisional’ or ‘interim’ facilitator unless the first consultation meeting officially endorses UNESCO as the “official” facilitator. Thus, the meeting agenda should foresee the nomination of the official facilitator.
2 Draft prepared by UNESCO Secretariat for the Action Line C7 E-Scienceconsultation meeting (22 October 2006, Beijing, PR China)
3 The draft terms of reference of Moderators/Facilitators adopted on the occasion of the consultation meeting of action lines moderators/facilitators (Geneva, 24 February 2006) uses the terms “Moderator” and “Facilitator” interchangeably. However, for the purpose of the present document, the term “Facilitator” will be used for the facilitation and coordination of the overall Action Line and “Moderator” for the coordinator of a sub- group.
4 Report can be further completed with additional information including, updates or additions to the existing WSIS stocktaking data base, which is available on http://www.itu.int/wsis/stocktaking/index.html.
5 Endorsed by the participants of the consultation meeting of Action Lines moderators/facilitators (24 February 2006, Geneva)